Latest DECEMBER 19th 2011

JULY 11th 2006

The Chinese are right.  [Note added Oct 14 2009: You have to skip forward over 3 years to find the US getting together with China on this]

I wrote the following on June 22nd before their missile launch. I have no reason to add to it.

The options are not to "bomb it, isolate it or hug it close" as suggested in a recent article in The Independent.
North Korea is not a nuclear threat unless we are extremely stupid and make it one.
They have absolutely no intention of attacking anyone.
The development of their nuclear weapons and delivery system is just the classic imperative of any regime of that sort in that situation. It does not protect the country from military action. If they were to use their nuclear weapons North Korea would meet with an absolutely crushing response, a fact of which they are only too well aware. We would not even need a nuclear response to effectively wipe them out.

Of course N Korea is an absurd, paranoid, hardline communist state. If we handle things right it may eventually emerge with the passing of a generation or two. They are not sitting on the world's oil reserves or in a position to bribe and corrupt the entire UN general assembly, so they are not a threat to the rest of the world. They probably survive by printing forged dollar bills, laundered through other states, some not a million miles from here.

I am not sure that 'talking' with the US would do any good as Americans have little idea of global realities as they affect N Kora, but they do need to talk with somebody. They should be made to understand that they do not need nuclear weapons and that developing them and the missiles is not useful and will cause them a great deal of grief. Classifying them as 'evil' and therefore ripe for extermination in their language is not the best way to achieve this.

There is, however, no crisis even if they launch a missile, unless it causes a problem by going astray.

OCTOBER 9th 2006
North Korea has carried out an underground nuclear test, as it was perfectly obviously going to do. It is a country in a disastraous economic state with a regime that stays in power by controlling all forms of communication and information. The deprived citizens who are regimented into the system will see this development as a triumphal success for their ministry of defence, securing them against attack by the enemies who are responsible for all their suffering.

Exasperating though this is, the danger is not that of North Korea launching an attack, but of selling its technological knowledge and others. The device they have detonated is probably not a deliverable weapon.

The choice of the international community is now between taking actions to bring North Korea closer to total economic collapse, with unpredictable results (e.g. sanctions and maritime blockades), or to attempt a dialogue with the disfunctional leader and his desperate followers to see if any rational progress can be made that might lead to a more secure future scenario. Contrary to the view that this test could cause an arms race in the region, there is not the smallest degree of logic in such a theory. George Bush's half-witted televised "Axis of Evil" speech, no doubt shown carefully to as many of the N. Korean population as possible, was all the Korean 'Dear Leader" needed to convince his suffering people that he was their shield and defender. We are still paying the price for this moronic performance.

A third possibility of 'targetted sanctions' to limit N. Korea's illegal international activities and try to prevent the import of materials wanted by the elite is problematic. This is a real mess, brought about partly by inept Bush grandstanding. The reputation of the UN and the authority of the Security Council is put at risk as usual.

Mr Bolton, the Bush administration's.representative at the UN, says the 'Axis of Evil' speech was not the cause of the nuclear test, as N. Korea has been working towards this for 10 years. Indeed they have, and it was inevitable as long as The Dear Leader and his supporters remained in power, as are further problems as long as his regime continues to possess the fanatical loyalty of the oppressed population and he can show the US is their enemy. It is this quasi religious support that is made so much more effective when the people are told first hand that the United States regards it as intrinsically evil. The speech had as similar effect in Iran though diminished as Iran has a population divided more ways in ethnicity, culture, religion and political tendency. The only way forward in Korea, or Iran for that matter, is to get through to the populace as a whole. Mr Bolton must know this, but he just can't be bothered. His approach to life, as he makes it quite clear, is "take it or leave it, I am a big guy and I represent a big country, and what have you lot ever achived?". It's a great way to make friends. He is right to ne just as tough as he thinks he has to be. We are up against people who can be very ruthless, particularly when up against a loss of face or a humiliation of their beliefs or self-belief. But a touch of intelligence is what nature demands for success in any field you like to name. How many N.Korean citizens believe they are being fed at the expense of US citizens (which they are), when the President of the US has called their government and, (they believe) their whole country, evil? Come on Bolton. You have asked me to get a life. I have had a few, and I am asking you to get a grip on reality

N. Korea having announced it will carry out another nuclear test if it feels the need, and that any criticism or call for sanctions by the US will be treated as an act of war, perhaps Mr Bolton will understand that his huffing and puffing like a pompous walrus is just creating an undignified farce. Leave it to China, Japan and the region for God's sake. By all means advise, but you have not the slightest idea of how to handle this situation in public, never have had and never will.

By the way, those for those of you who may have been confused by the media reporting on this subject, a 'Chapter 7' UN Resolution does not imply that it will be enforced militarily. Only a Chapter 7 resolution can be enforced under the UN charter, but a given Chapter 7 UN Resolution may not necessarily call for all possible means of enforcement including military action.

Today's BBC Radio 4 The World at One carried.excellent interviews on the N.Korean problem. The best was with a Japanese spokesman. I found his contribution immensely encouraging, not that he offered any quick solution, but his understanding of the situation was at a vey high level indeed. With people of this calibre in politics, I can sleep at night.

BBC News\Last Updated: Thursday, 12 October 2006, 21:05 GMT 22:05 UK

Vote on N Korea sanctions delayed
China and Russia have delayed a vote on a new UN resolution, drafted by the US, that calls for sanctions on North Korea over its claimed nuclear test.

OCTOBER 14th 2006
A UN Resolution restricting trade with N.Korea has been passed unanimously.  The important point here is not so much the effect of the sanctions (though if enforced they make sense) but the united approach  of the UN and the members of its Security  Council. That is the good news.

UN slaps sanctions on North Korea
The UN Security Council has voted unanimously in favour of a resolution imposing sanctions on North Korea over its claimed nuclear test.

Resolution 1718 imposes weapons and financial sanctions but is not backed by the threat of military force.

North Korea's UN envoy said he totally rejected the resolution and walked out.

After hours of talks, China agreed to back the resolution but said it had "reservations" about provisions for cargo checks on North Korean ships.

If North Korea returns to six-party talks and these talks achieve progress, sanctions... should be automatically lifted
Sergei Ivanov
Russian defence minister

US President George W Bush said the UN had taken a "swift and tough" step to show its determination to keep the Korean Peninsula free of nuclear weapons.

North Korea's UN envoy, Pak Gil Yon, left the UN chamber after rejecting the "unjustifiable" resolution and accusing the Security Council of neglecting US pressure on North Korea.

He warned that any increase in US pressure would be considered as a "declaration of war".

The resolution

  • Requires all countries to prevent the sale or transfer of materials related to Pyongyang's unconventional weapons programmes, as well as large-sized military items such as tanks, missiles and helicopters

  • Demands nations freeze funds overseas of people or businesses connected with North Korea's nuclear and ballistic missile programs

  • Allows nations to inspect "as necessary" cargo moving in and out of North Korea to check for banned items

  • Bans export of luxury goods to North Korea

  • Calls on Pyongyang to return "without precondition" to stalled six-nation talks on its nuclear programme
  • 'Not indefinite'

    John Bolton, the US envoy to the UN, warned the Security Council that stronger measures might be required if North Korea did not comply.

    Believed to have 'handful' of nuclear weapons
    But not thought to have any small enough to put in a missile
    Could try dropping from plane, though world watching closely

    China and Russia have been concerned that the cargo inspections permitted in the resolution could spark naval confrontations with North Korean boats.

    Russian Defence Minister Sergei Ivanov said that both Moscow and Beijing believed the sanctions should not be viewed as indefinite.

    "If North Korea returns to six-party talks and these talks achieve progress, sanctions... should be automatically lifted," he said.

    China's UN envoy Wang Guangya called on UN member states to adopt a "prudent and responsible attitude" and refrain from "provocative steps".

    The BBC's Laura Trevelyan at the UN says China has taken the slightly confusing position of apparently disagreeing with something to which it has signed up.

    She says the test of the resolution will be in the implementation of the sanctions.

    Revised resolution

    The US proposed the initial draft resolution but revised it to remove the threat of imminent military action and dilute a blanket ban on defence exports in an effort to allay Chinese and Russian concerns.

    US officials say they may have detected radioactive gas consistent with a nuclear explosion near the site of North Korea's claimed nuclear test on Monday.

    Throughout the week there has been uncertainty about whether North Korea carried out a nuclear test, tried to but failed, or made a false claim.

    White House officials cautioned that this result alone did not confirm a successful test but it could mean that a nuclear test had been attempted.

    Story from BBC NEWS:

    Published: 2006/10/14 20:45:51 GMT

    © BBC MMVI

    OCTOBER 31 2006

    North Korea agrees to return to nuclear talks

    Reuters Tuesday October 31, 04:26 PM
    BEIJING (Reuters) - North Korea agreed on Tuesday to return to six-party talks on dismantling its atomic weapons just weeks after staging its first nuclear test, drawing cautious welcome from President George W. Bush and Asian powers.

    Envoys from North Korea, the United States and China met in Beijing and agreed to restart the stalled talks in the near future, the Chinese Foreign Ministry said on its Web site, promising an end to a year-long hiatus in the negotiations.

    Bush welcomed North Korea's agreement to return to the nuclear talks, but added he would send teams to Asia to ensure U.N. Security Council sanctions on the budding nuclear power were enforced.

    "Obviously we've still got a lot of work to do," Bush told reporters in Washington.

    The other three countries involved in the talks are South Korea, Japan and Russia. A fifth round of talks in Beijing broke off last November without progress and North Korea later protested over a U.S. crackdown on its international finances.

    After the breakthrough meeting in Beijing, Washington's envoy, U.S. Assistant Secretary of State Christopher Hill, told a news conference there that he wanted "rapid progress" from the next talks, possibly in November or December.

    But he said fully settling the nuclear standoff was likely to be difficult and time-consuming.

    "We are a long way from our goal still," he said. "I have not broken out the cigars and champagne quite yet."

    Hill spelled out a contentious bundle of issues that would preoccupy negotiators and could again derail talks, including the U.S. financial restrictions, how to ensure that North Korea kept any disarmament commitments, and the diplomatic damage done by Pyongyang's October 9 nuclear test.

    North Korea made no explicit promise not to conduct any more tests, Hill said, adding that a U.N. Security Council resolution imposing sanctions on Pyongyang remained in force.

    "I think it's self-evident they should not engage in such provocations," Hill said of further tests.


    The next six-party talks will address North Korea's concerns with the U.S. financial restrictions, possibly through a working group, he said, adding that Pyongyang needs to abandon "illicit activities" that the U.S. has said include currency counterfeiting and drug trafficking.

    Washington announced steps to restrict North Korean access to international financial networks days after the six-party group reached broad agreement on September 19, 2005, towards negotiating an end to North Korea's nuclear weapons and drawing the country out of isolation.

    Hill said North Korea had not made lifting the banking restrictions a condition of talks.

    After North Korea carried out its nuclear test on October 9, the U.N. Security Council voted to impose financial and arms sanctions on Pyongyang.

    "The financial sanctions are effective unless the Security Council adopts a separate decision, whether before or after the talks," South Korea's chief nuclear envoy Chun Yung-woo told reporters in Seoul.

    "What's important is the countries prepare for the resumption of the talks so that there will be actual progress," he said.

    Japan's top government spokesman, Yasuhisa Shiozaki, welcomed the decision to resume the talks, saying the six-party forum hosted by China since August 2003 was the best framework to resolve the standoff, Kyodo news agency said.

    A Japanese government official told Reuters: "We think this could be a step in a positive direction, but we still have some caution."

    Earlier on Tuesday, before word of the talks resumption, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Liu Jianchao said Beijing had no plans to sever aid to or trade with North Korea.

    Liu denied that an apparent drop in China's oil exports to the isolated fortress state signalled a shift in policy. Chinese trade data released on Monday indicated that in September China sent no crude to energy-famished North Korea.


    The North relies on China for nearly all its oil, but has strained long-standing ties first by test-firing missiles in July and then by testing a nuclear device -- both despite public pleas for restraint from China's leaders.

    Beijing bluntly criticised the North's nuclear test and backed the U.N. sanctions.

    "China has been very engaged," said Hill. "The fact that China and other countries have felt so strongly about getting the DPRK back in the process is due in part to the fact that we have a multilateral process."

    The DPRK, or Democratic People's Republic of Korea, is the official name of North Korea.

    (Additional reporting by Jason Subler and Benjamin Kang Lim in Beijing, Carol Giacomo in Washington, Linda Sieg in Tokyo and Jack Kim in Seoul)

    FEBRUARY 13th 2007
    It being in the leadership's best interest now, as other avenues have become more difficult, N. Korea takes what's on offer.
    Is it a fair deal, and will they stick to it anyway? Well, it's movement. To that extent it gives us a chance to find out. I am in favour. I do not subscribe to the Bolton school of diplomacy where a lack of progress causes ever increasing pressure build-up. Something tells me Bolton is not a scientist.

    N.Korea agrees to disarmament steps

    Reuters Tuesday February 13, 10:29 AM
    BEIJING (Reuters) - North Korea agreed to take steps towards nuclear disarmament under a groundbreaking deal struck on Tuesday that will bring the impoverished communist state more than $300 million (154 million pounds) worth of aid.

    Under the agreement, which was reached by six countries in Beijing after nearly a week of talks, Pyongyang will freeze the reactor at the heart of its nuclear programme and allow international inspections of the site.

    "This progress marks another firm and important step towards the denuclearisation of the peninsula," China's chief delegate, Wu Dawei, told the closing session of the talks, which was carried live on television from the heavily guarded Diaoyutai state guesthouse.

    "It is favourable for the peace process in northeast Asia and for the improvement of ties between relevant countries," he said, after which delegates rose hesitatingly to their feet in restrained applause.

    The proposed plan hammered out by the two Koreas, the United States, Japan, Russia, and China will only be the first step in locating and dismantling North Korea's nuclear arms activities, leaving many crucial questions to future negotiations.

    "This is only one phase of denuclearisation. We're not done," chief U.S. negotiator Christopher Hill said.

    As details of the draft leaked out earlier, Japan was already voicing doubt that any agreement could be made to stick, and a prominent U.S. conservative decried it as a "very bad deal".

    John Bolton, former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, said the Communist state should not be rewarded with "massive shipments of heavy fuel oil" for only partially dismantling its nuclear programme.

    "It sends exactly the wrong signal to would-be proliferators around the world," he told CNN.


    Under the agreement, North Korea must take the steps within 60 days, and in return it will receive 50,000 tonnes of fuel oil or economic aid of equal value.

    It will receive another 950,000 tonnes of fuel oil or equivalent when it takes further steps to disable its nuclear capabilities, including providing a complete inventory of its plutonium -- the fuel used in Pyongyang's first nuclear test blast in October.

    The 1 million tonnes of fuel would be worth around $300 million at current prices for heavy fuel oil, which is used in power stations, shipping and elsewhere.

    The steps for now do not involve the provision of 2,000 megawatts of electricity that South Korea pledged in a September 2005 deal reached by the six countries. That is reserved for after the completion of denuclearisation of North Korea.

    The electricity, at an estimated cost of $8.55 billion over 10 years, would be about equal to North Korea's current output.

    The Beijing talks had focussed on how to begin implementing a September 2005 accord that offered Pyongyang aid and security assurances in return for dismantling its weapons capabilities.

    The United States would contribute to the infusion of oil and aid for North Korea, meaning that President George W. Bush must win Congressional approval for the deal, the New York Times reported.

    North Korea stepped down the path to nuclear disarmament before, in a 1994 agreement with the Clinton administration that also promised aid.

    But that Joint Framework agreement fell apart amid accusations of bad faith between Pyongyang and Washington, and the agreement collapsed in late 2002 after Washington accused North Korea of seeking to produce weapons-grade uranium.

    A gulf of distrust divides the isolated North from others in the talks, especially the United States. Diplomats have stressed that even this new initial disarmament action could founder.

    "This is a first step," Japanese Foreign Minister Taro Aso told U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice in a telephone call, Kyodo reported. "Whether it actually goes ahead remains to be seen. We do not know whether it will go ahead just because it has been signed."

    (Additional reporting by Ben Blanchard, Nick Macfie, Lindsay Beck, Ian Ransom and Teruaki Ueno in Beijing)

    FEBRUARY 13th 2007

    Korean nuclear deal delays disarmament

    By ALEXA OLESEN, Associated Press Writer 

    BEIJING - A hard-won disarmament pact that the U.S. and four other nations struck with North Korea on Tuesday requires the communist nation to halt its nuclear programs in exchange for oil while leaving the ultimate abandonment of those weapons projects to a potentially trouble-filled future.

    In a sign of potential problems to come, North Korea's state news agency said the country was receiving 1 million tons of oil for a "temporary suspension" of its nuclear facilities — and failed to mention the full disarmament for which the agreement calls.

    It wasn't clear if the report represented an attempt by the government to backtrack on the deal, or was simply a statement of bluster for a deeply impoverished domestic audience that Pyongyang has rallied around the nuclear program as a cause for national pride.

    And by tackling so many issues in a process likely to take years, the deal could unravel, pulled apart by differing agendas of its six signers, which also include China, South Korea, Russia and Japan.

    "We have a lot of work to do," U.S. Assistant Secretary of State Christopher Hill told reporters. "It's certainly not the end of the process, it's really just the end of the beginning of the process."

    Nevertheless, the agreement marks a turnabout for North Korea, which rattled the world only four months ago when it tested a nuclear device. If Pyongyang follows through with its promises, they would be the first moves the communist state has made to scale back its atomic development since it kicked out international inspectors and restarted its sole operating nuclear reactor in 2003.

    "These talks represent the best opportunity to use diplomacy to address North Korea's nuclear programs," President Bush said in a statement. "They reflect the common commitment of the participants to a Korean Peninsula that is free of nuclear weapons."
    Robert J. Einhorn, a former State Department official who visited North Korea with then-Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, said Americans should applaud the agreement, but he predicted it would come under heavy questioning from both the right and the left.

    He said, "I think a number of people are going to ask the question, `Couldn't this deal have been concluded three or four years ago before North Korea conducted its nuclear test and acquired enough additional plutonium to build anywhere from six to 10 nuclear weapons?'"

    The accord, completed at a Chinese government guesthouse by negotiators from six countries after tortuous talks, lays out an ambitious agenda. It sets a firm 60-day timetable for North Korea to seal its main nuclear reactor and begin accounting for other nuclear programs.

    Within that time, more talks are planned on ending the hostilities between North Korea and the United States and Japan that have made northeast Asia a tense corner of the world. In return, North Korea will receive 50,000 tons of heavy fuel oil, a modest down payment on a promised 1 million tons in oil or aid of a similar value if it ultimately disarms. One million tons of oil would be equivalent to more than two-thirds of North Korea's entire oil consumption in 2004, according to the CIA Factbook. Hill said the aid package was worth about $250 million at current prices.

    In the negotiations, envoys debated who would pay for North Korea's disarmament. China, the U.S., South Korea and Russia agreed to foot the bill though Moscow may contribute in the form of debt relief. Japan has refused to provide aid until Pyongyang fully accounts for the abductions of Japanese citizens by North Korea.

    "We understand it marks the first concrete step by North Korea toward its nuclear dismantlement," Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe said after the accord was struck in Beijing. "But our position that Japan cannot provide support without a resolution of the abduction issue is unchanged."

    Disarmament, however, is likely to remain the thorniest problem.

    "What if North Korea doesn't show them to inspectors, if they say we've stopped this and shut down that, what if they say you have to trust us?" said Liu Gongliang, a physicist at China's Institute of Applied Physics and Computational Mathematics who has followed North Korea's nuclear program for the Chinese government.

    Under the deal, the North is required to seal its main nuclear reactor and related facilities at Yongbyon, north of the capital, within 60 days and allow inspections by the International Atomic Energy Agency.

    Senior IAEA figures have met regularly with North Korean diplomats in past months preparing for such a mission, and a diplomat familiar with the status of preparations told The Associated Press that IAEA inspectors could be on site "within days" once given the go-ahead.

    But no timetable was set for a final declaration by North Korea of all its nuclear programs and their ultimate dismantling.

    North Korea has sidestepped previous agreements. It allegedly operated its uranium-based weapons program even as it froze a plutonium-based one, sparking the latest nuclear crisis in late 2002. The country is believed to have countless mountainside tunnels in which to hide projects.

    The uranium program was not explicitly addressed in the agreement. But, Hill said, "I certainly have made very clear repeatedly that we need to ensure that we know precisely the status of that."

    The nuclear issue has frequently been ensnarled by lingering frictions between the North and its neighbors, as well as a dispute over U.S. sanctions against the regime for alleged money laundering and counterfeiting activities. Hill said the sanctions issue would be resolved within 30 days, but didn't provide specifics.

    The United States will also begin the process of removing North Korea from its designation as a terror-sponsoring state and also on ending U.S. trade sanctions, but no deadlines have been was set, according to the agreement. Washington's blacklisting of a Macau bank in September 2005 had led the North to a more-than-yearlong boycott of the six-nation talks during which it tested its first nuclear bomb.

    MARCH 01 2007

    N.Korea pledges to denuclearize in talks

    SEOUL, South Korea - North Korea's No. 2 leader pledged his country's commitment Thursday to giving up its nuclear program during a meeting with a visiting high-level South Korean delegation.

    "The denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula is the dying wish" of the country's late founding president Kim Il Sung, said Kim Yong Nam. The North "will make efforts to realize it," he said.

    At the meeting, South Korean Unification Minister Lee Jae-joung pressed the North to implement a Feb. 13 pledge to take initial steps to disarm.

    "It is important to make efforts to ensure that South and North Korea cooperate and six countries each assume their responsibilities," Lee said in reference to the accord reached last month in Beijing between North Korea and five other countries.

    This week's Cabinet-level talks between the North and South — the highest-level regular contact between the Koreas — are the first in seven months. The talks resumed after North Korea's pledge to shut down its main nuclear reactor within 60 days in exchange for aid.

    Earlier Thursday, North Korean negotiators appealed for aid from the South, but Seoul appeared resistant to promising any major assistance until Pyongyang keeps its pledge to start dismantling its nuclear program.

    MARCH 07 2007   
    Let's face it, N Korea is going to be wobbly for some tme yet. It's diplomats are not in a stable or even rational position.
    Much patience required.

    NKorea calls off Japan talks in Vietnam

    by Harumi Ozawa

    HANOI (AFP) - North Korea pulled out of afternoon talks with Japan aimed at normalising bilateral ties here Wednesday, without giving a reason or saying whether further meetings would be held.

    Diplomats from Tokyo and Pyongyang met in the morning for their first formal two-way talks in more than a year, following a landmark six-nation deal struck last month that aims to get North Korea to give up its nuclear weapons.

    The delegations had been due to meet again at 3:00 pm (0800 GMT), but a North Korean embassy official in Hanoi said the meeting had been cancelled.

    "We cannot disclose the reason now," said the official who refused to give his name. "Maybe we will explain it later."

    He declined to say whether the North Korean side would meet the Japanese delegation again during the talks officially scheduled to last until Thursday.

    The foreign ministry in Japan said it assumed talks would resume Thursday, but it was unclear whether further talks would go ahead.

    Tokyo and Pyongyang had set out to discuss resolving a row over Pyongyang's abductions of Japanese citizens in the 1970s and 80s.

    Pyongyang admitted in 2002 that it had abducted 13 Japanese citizens to train its spies in Japanese language and culture. It returned five of them and their families but insists the others are dead.

    Japan wants to see all abductees repatriated and has demanded a thorough investigation and extradition of the perpetrators. Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe has vowed he will not budge on the emotive issue.

    Tokyo has refused to fund the six-nation deal -- under which North Korea is set to receive 50,000 tonnes of fuel in return for closing a key nuclear facility and allowing in UN nuclear inspectors -- until the kidnapping issue has been resolved.

    In the February 13 deal, China, Japan, South Korea, Russia and the United States also assured North Korea of diplomatic and security guarantees if the regime completely abandons its nuclear programme.

    North Korea's move Wednesday left delegates scratching their heads. In Hanoi, a Foreign Ministry official said that North Korea had informed the Japanese delegation that the afternoon talks were suspended but could not confirm if the talks would go ahead.

    In Tokyo, Japanese foreign ministry deputy press secretary Tomohiko Taniguchi told AFP: "The meeting is suspended this afternoon. As far as why it has come to this, we would decline to disclose the reason.

    "Japan made our arguments about the abduction issue in the two and a half hours of the morning session.

    "We started the meeting with a plan to discuss kidnapping today and the normalisation of the relationships coupled with settlement of the historical issues to be taken up tomorrow.

    "So the schedule remains the same for tomorrow, as it is a separate track from today's topic."

    North Korea's main priority at the Hanoi talks has been for Japan to atone for its 1910-1945 occupation of the Korean peninsula.

    While North Korea did not spell out reasons for cancelling the meeting, Rodong Sinmun, the mouthpiece of the ruling Workers Party, lashed out at Japanese leaders' recent remarks on wartime sex slaves.

    Abe, who built his career campaigning on North Korea's abductions, has denied that Japan coerced thousands of so-called "comfort women," many of them Koreans, into the imperial army's brothels.

    "The Japanese reactionaries' despicable distortion of history is an intolerable insult to the Korean people, the victim," the Rodong Sinmun said, as quoted by the official Korean Central News Agency.

    "The Japanese reactionaries are increasing pressure upon the DPRK (North Korea), persistently raising a hue and cry over the already settled 'abduction issue,'" it said. "This is linked with their scheme of reinvasion of Korea."

    In their morning meeting Japan's top delegate Koichi Haraguchi and his North Korean counterpart Song Il-Ho shook hands but did not smile for the cameras.

    MARCH 14th 2007

    North Korea committed to disarmament pact: IAEA

    By Chris Buckley and Lindsay Beck 

    BEIJING (Reuters) - North Korea is committed to a disarmament pact reached in February but wants sanctions lifted first, the head of the U.N. nuclear watchdog said on Wednesday on his return from a trip he said had cleared the air.

    But he said North Korea wanted U.S. financial restrictions against it resolved before it would shut its Yongbyon nuclear reactor and readmit inspectors as agreed in a February 13 accord reached at six-party talks in Beijing.

    "The DPRK mentioned that they are waiting for the lifting of sanctions with regard to the Macau bank before they implement the part of the agreement allowing the agency to monitor and verify the shutdown of the Yongbyon facility," ElBaradei told a news conference, referring to North Korea by its official name, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

    Pyongyang stunned the world last year with its first nuclear test, drawing widespread condemnation and U.N. sanctions.

    The February agreement was reached at negotiations in Beijing in which China, the United States, South Korea, Japan and Russia worked to convince the North to scrap its atomic program.

    ElBaradei's visit was the agency's first since December 2002 when North Korea expelled inspectors as an earlier disarmament deal fell apart. It withdrew from the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty days later.


    The United States said that within 30 days of the February deal it would settle a dispute over financial restrictions stemming from North Korean bank accounts frozen in Macau that Washington says Pyongyang used to launder illegal earnings.

    That deadline now looms and U.S. envoy Christopher Hill told reporters in Beijing on Wednesday: "The Macau issue will be resolved as we've promised."

    ElBaradei said North Korea's seeing through the initial steps of the deal, in which it must shut Yongbyon in return for energy aid and security guarantees, hinged on Washington making good on that promise.

    "Once that happens, they are looking to fully cooperate with us and implement the agreement in the timeframe mentioned."

    Hill, referring to Yongbyon, told reporters: "My understanding is that it hasn't been completely shut down yet."

    ElBaradei said he had met three officials during his short stay in North Korea, including the head of the North's atomic energy agency, but not its chief nuclear negotiator, Kim Kye-gwan.

    Nonetheless, he said he was positive about the visit.

    "The trip cleared the air. It created a positive environment for our future relationship," he said.

    A Non-Aligned Movement diplomat said: "They are speaking to each other, so at least there is some progress."

    Referring to ElBaradei not meeting North Korea's chief nuclear negotiator, the diplomat said: "We don't see this as a problem. The North Korean chief nuclear negotiator said he had another engagement which he had agreed to earlier.

    "We need to give both sides more time to have more discussions -- this is such a complex issue that cannot be resolved in one or two days."


    The IAEA inspectors will be key to verifying whether North Korea makes good on its pledge to shut down Yongbyon.

    South Korean Foreign Minister Song Min-soon said earlier that North Korea had shown no signs of closing the reactor.

    Earlier this week, a U.S. official said North Korea was preparing to shut down the Yongbyon complex, but other U.S. officials have been more guarded.

    In addition to Hill, South Korean envoy Chun Yung-woo arrived in the Chinese capital for working-group meetings as the multilateral waltz heats up ahead of a new round of six-party talks opening on Monday.

    Both envoys, along with China's Wu Dawei, were to take part in talks aimed at fleshing out parts of the pact and the three were expected to meet ElBaradei.

    Western diplomats said they expected no immediate progress and warned that the process of North Korea establishing relations with the IAEA or bringing back inspectors would need time.

    "North Korea wants to show that they are in the driving seat. They want to drive home the point that they are on eye level when it comes to these negotiations," one diplomat in Vienna said.

    (Additional reporting by Jack Kim and Jon Herskovitz in Seoul, Carol Giacomo in Washington and Karin Strohecker in Vienna)

    MARCH 15th 2007

    U.S. bank move opens rift with China

    By Chris Buckley 

    BEIJING (Reuters) - A rift opened between the United States and China on Thursday on how to end a dispute about North Korean bank accounts, with China angry over a U.S. decision it said might harm talks to end Pyongyang's nuclear threat.

    MARCH 17th

    Envoy: $25M North Korea dispute resolved

    By MARI YAMAGUCHI, Associated Press Writer 

    BEIJING - The top American nuclear envoy said Sunday that he believed North Korea and the U.S. had "gotten past" a dispute over $25 million in frozen North Korean funds, and the communist nation was moving toward nuclear disarmament.

    MARCH 22nd  

    North Korea nuclear talks break down

    By BO-MI LIM, Associated Press Writer 

    BEIJING - Negotiations on halting North Korea's nuclear program broke down abruptly Thursday, with the country's chief envoy to the talks flying home after a dispute over money frozen in a Macau bank could not be resolved.

    Kim waved to reporters at the airport but did not say anything.

    China issued a statement saying the talks would take a recess but did not give a restart date.

    "The parties agreed to recess and will resume the talks at the earliest opportunity to continue to discuss and formulate an action plan for the next phase," it said.

    The breakdown raises doubts over meeting a deadline in the Feb. 13 denuclearization agreement that calls for U.N. inspectors to verify the closure of North Korea's main nuclear reactor at Yongbyon by April 14.

    But the top U.S. nuclear envoy said he was still optimistic that disarmament deadlines can be met despite the breakdown.

    "It is our strong view that we are still on schedule," Assistant Secretary of State Christopher Hill said, referring to the April deadline that calls for U.N. inspectors to verify the closure of North Korea's main nuclear reactor at Yongbyon.

    Hill added he still expected other goals requiring Pyongyang to declare all of its nuclear programs and for fuel and economic assistance to be sent to North Korea to be met by the end of the year.

    In Tokyo, Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe criticized North Korea for not being constructive.

    "It's clear there is nothing for North Korea to gain from this kind of move," Abe said. "This kind of attitude is meaningless."

    Abe said North Korea only will be accepted by the international society if it takes concrete steps toward complying with its commitment to dismantle its nuclear programs.

    Also Thursday, the aircraft carrier USS Ronald Reagan arrived in South Korea for joint military exercises, which North Korea called "a dangerous provocation that casts a shadow" at the nuclear talks.

    This round of talks has been dogged by troubles since it started Monday, with Pyongyang refusing to take part for two days because of problems over the transfer of $25 million in North Korean funds frozen since 2005 at Banco Delta Asia in Macau under pressure from the United States.

    "This round of talks started with the BDA problem and ended with the BDA problem," Japanese envoy Kenichiro Sasae said.

    Banco Delta Asia was blacklisted by Washington on suspicion the funds were connected to money-laundering or counterfeiting. The North boycotted the international nuclear talks for more than a year over the issue.

    U.S. officials announced this week that the money would be transferred to the North Koreans, saying it was up to the Monetary Authority of Macau, a Chinese territory, to release the funds.

    China had promised to resolve the issue as quickly as possible by transferring the funds to a North Korean account at the Bank of China.

    Officials said the Chinese bank held up the transfer because of worries that the money had been at the center of criminal investigations.

    "The Bank of China has concerns (about accepting the money) and not all the concerns have been assuaged," Chinese negotiator Wu Dawei said.

    Adding to the confusion over the matter, the Bank of China denied Thursday that it was told to accept the money.

    "I can tell you that up until now, we were not asked to deal with this business," Li Lihui, the bank's vice chairman and president, told reporters in Hong Kong.

    With details about the fund's transfer sketchy, various explanations have been offered by other parties.

    Russian envoy Alexander Losyukov, who also left for home Thursday, was quoted by ITAR-Tass news agency as saying "the whole problem came from the American side."

    He said the United States failed to assure the Chinese side that the Bank of China could receive the funds without fear of facing U.S. sanctions or a "negative attitude" from the banking community and the U.S. government.

    South Korea's Yonhap news agency said the money transfer was being delayed because Macau authorities were having difficulty confirming the ownership of 50 North Korean accounts, most of which are under the names of the heads of Zokwang Trading Co., a North Korean-run firm in Macau that U.S. officials have long suspected of being involved in money-laundering.

    "The difficulty of this issue is beyond our expectations and due to some technical and procedural issues we had not expected completely before," Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Liu Jianchao told a news conference.

    Wu, the Chinese negotiator, said that in a last-ditch effort to salvage the talks he called Kim late at night to persuade him to take part.

    "When I called Vice Minister Kim Kye Gwan, it was 11:15 at night. ... He got out of bed after taking his sleeping pills to take my call," Wu said.

    Wu then had to convince an operator at Hill's hotel to wake him at 1:30 a.m. to discuss the impasse.

    The six parties — the two Koreas, the United States, Russia, China and Japan — were in Beijing to discuss how to push forward the landmark deal in which Pyongyang agreed to start dismantling its nuclear facilities in exchange for energy and economic aid.

    Under the deal, the North is to receive energy and economic aid and a start toward normalizing relations with the U.S. and Japan, in return for beginning the disarmament process. The regime ultimately would receive assistance equivalent to 1 million tons of heavy fuel oil if it fully discloses and dismantles all its nuclear programs.


    Associated Press writers Mari Yamaguchi, Audra Ang and Christopher Bodeen in Beijing, and Jae-Soon Chang in Seoul contributed to this report.

    JUNE 19th 2007

    U.S. hopes for 6-way Korea nuclear talks in July

    By Dan Sloan 12:30 BST

    North Korea should move quickly to shut down its source of bomb-grade plutonium, a top U.S. envoy said on Tuesday, voicing hope that stalled six-party talks on scrapping its nuclear arms program could resume in early July.

    But shortly after U.S. Assistant Secretary of State Christopher Hill arrived in Tokyo for talks with his Japanese counterpart, Japan's NHK television said North Korea had fired a short-range missile towards the Sea of Japan.

    Quoting a Japanese government source, NHK said one missile had been launched earlier in the day. NHK said it was not a ballistic missile.

    Chief Cabinet Secretary Yasuhisa Shiozaki declined either to confirm or deny reports of the missile launch, but told reporters: "I don't think we're currently in a situation where Japan's national security has been significantly affected."

    Hill, speaking to reporters before word of the missile launch, sounded an optimistic note.

    "I'm very hopeful we can get to the six-party talks of some kind in early July," he said after arriving in Tokyo.

    Hill said that North Korea appeared to have received the funds it had demanded be released from a frozen bank account in Macau as a condition for closing its only nuclear reactor, the source of its weapons-grade plutonium.

    "As far as we know, it has been transferred. I am sure that money is in the North Korean bank account," Hill said in Seoul earlier.

    North Korea said at the weekend it would allow U.N. nuclear inspectors into the country as part of a disarmament deal after nearly $25 million in blocked funds had started to make its way back to the impoverished country.


    The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) plans to send a senior delegation to North Korea next week to agree details for a return of its inspectors to monitor the reactor shutdown, agreed to under Pyongyang's February 13 deal with major regional powers.

    "We want the IAEA to be able to quickly make an agreement and get on with shutting down the reactor," Hill told reporters in Seoul, where he met South Korean officials.

    China, chief backer of the reclusive state, praised North Korea for its latest move.

    "We believe that this step shows North Korea's sincere will to implement the February 13 joint document and express our welcome," Foreign Ministry spokesman Qin Gang said.

    Qin told a Beijing news conference: "We also hope that all the concerned parties will continue taking positive steps, will conscientiously abide by their commitments and take actions in a comprehensive and balanced way."

    North Korea plans to seal the reactor at Yongbyon, about 100 km (60 miles) north of Pyongyang, in the second half of July, Russia's Interfax news agency quoted an unidentified North Korean diplomatic source as saying on Monday.

    Pyongyang, which tested its first nuclear device last October, is widely believed to already produced enough material for several weapons.


    Despite more than two months of delay in starting to dismantle the North's atom bomb program, it would still be possible to complete the nuclear disarmament of the communist state by the end of the year, Hill has said.

    The North missed a mid-April deadline to shut its Soviet-era reactor agreed to under the February 13 deal. Its money had been blocked by Washington for suspected ties to Pyongyang's alleged dollar counterfeiting and other illicit activity.

    If Pyongyang keeps its part of the deal and shuts down its nuclear facilities, the United States is likely to provide the economically struggling state with $2 million worth of emergency humanitarian aid, Japan's Mainichi newspaper reported.

    In Tokyo, Hill was set to meet Kenichiro Sasae, Japan's envoy to the six-party talks, which bring together the two Koreas, China, the United States, Russia and Japan.

    Analysts said Hill was likely to urge Japan to ease its tough stance with North Korea in a feud over citizens kidnapped decades ago so that it could take part in providing energy aid to the North. Such a change in stance would be tough for Prime Minister Shinzo Abe ahead of a national election expected in July.

    In public, Hill stressed that the abduction issue -- an emotive one for many Japanese -- was also vital to Washington, but added that progress on denuclearization could help build a base for progress on the kidnappings.

    Separately, Philippine Foreign Secretary Alberto Romulo left Beijing for Pyongyang to meet North Korea's number two leader, Kim Yong-nam, and newly appointed Foreign Minister Pak Ui-chun.

    Romulo told Reuters ahead of his visit that he would invite Pak to the ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF) in Manila on August 2.

    ARF is the Asia-Pacific's main security grouping. In addition to the 10 members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, it brings together other countries, including all of the participants in the six-party talks.

    (Additional reporting by Chris Buckley and Benjamin Kang Lim in Beijing, Jon Herskovitz in Seoul, and Linda Sieg, Chisa Fujioka and George Nishiyama in Tokyo)

    JULY 14th 2007

    North Korea gets oil for closing reactor

    By BO-MI LIM, Associated Press Writer 

    U.N. inspectors arrived in North Korea on Saturday to monitor the communist country's long-anticipated promise to scale back its nuclear weapons program, while the top U.S. nuclear envoy said he expected Pyongyang's reactor to be shut down in a matter of days.

    An initial shipment of oil aid arrived hours earlier Saturday, in return for Pyongyang's pledge to close down its main nuclear reactor. The move would be the North's first step in nearly five years toward the de-nuclearization of the peninsula.

    The 10-member team from the International Atomic Energy Agency was heading directly to Yongbyon, about 60 miles northeast of the capital, to begin monitoring the shutdown.

    "We are going directly to the nuclear site at Yongbyon," IAEA team chief Adel Tolba told broadcaster APTN outside the Pyongyang airport. Footage showed dozens of cardboard boxes being loaded onto the back of two trucks.

    Tolba said the team would stay in North Korea as long as needed to complete its work.

    After years of tortuous negotiations and delays — during which the North argued its nuclear program was needed for self-defense — the reclusive communist regime said earlier this month that once it received the oil shipment, it would consider halting its reactor.

    North Korea did not give any timetable for starting the shutdown but top U.S. nuclear envoy Christopher Hill said it would happen over the next few days.

    "I think it's a matter of today, tomorrow, maybe Monday," Hill told reporters in the Japanese resort town of Hakone south of Tokyo.

    Hill also said he expected the North to submit a list of its nuclear facilities within months, as was agreed to in February's round of talks.

    "We expect the comprehensive list in a matter of several weeks, possibly several months," Hill said.

    The South Korean tanker No. 9 Han Chang, carrying 6,200 tons of heavy fuel oil, arrived Saturday at the North's northeastern port of Sonbong, and the oil was being unloaded, a Unification Ministry official said. The South Korean official spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to talk to the media.

    Saturday's delivery was part of 50,000 tons of heavy fuel oil the North has been promised in exchange for shutting down the Yongbyon reactor. Pyongyang eventually will receive 1 million tons of oil for dismantling its nuclear program.

    After the IAEA team installs monitoring equipment, personnel will remain at Yongbyon to ensure the reactor remains shut down, said a diplomat familiar with North Korea's file at the IAEA.

    "The IAEA plans to have a permanent presence there, with some experts remaining at the site continuously," said the diplomat, who requested anonymity because of the sensitivity of the issue.

    North Korea agreed earlier this year to shut down its reactor and take other steps toward disarmament in exchange for the oil and other financial and political concessions in a deal with the United States, China, Japan, South Korea and Russia.

    The agreement eased a standoff that began in October 2002, when the U.S. said North Korean officials had admitted during meetings in Pyongyang to having a secret uranium enrichment program. Washington said that violated a 1994 agreement for the North's disarmament, and a month later halted oil shipments under that deal.

    The North reacted by expelling IAEA monitors on New Year's Eve, withdrawing from the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty and restarting the reactor.

    Since then, North Korea has occasionally shut down the reactor to remove fuel rods and extract plutonium — and is believed to have harvested enough to construct at least a dozen atomic bombs.

    The North set off an underground test explosion in October, leading to intensified international efforts to negotiate an end to Pyongyang's arms program.

    When it does act to shut down the reactor again, the North will term it simply a suspension of operations — a move that could be easily reversed, as it was in 2002.

    But Hill said Friday that Washington hoped to quickly move beyond the mere freeze of the reactor and dismantle the program by year's end.

    "Where we would like to be at the end of the year is with the Yongbyon facility disabled," he said after meeting with his Japanese counterpart in Tokyo to prepare for another round of the six-nation nuclear talks next week in Beijing.

    "As I've said before, we lost a lot of time in the early part of this year and now we have to do a lot in the second part if we are to achieve our objectives," Hill said.

    The U.S. was forced to back down on a separate banking dispute in which Washington blacklisted a Macau bank for dealing with the North, saying it was helping the regime launder money. The bank remains banned from doing business with U.S. institutions, but the North Korean funds were freed earlier this year with U.S. approval.


    Associated Press Writers Anita Chang in Beijing and Bo-Mi Lim in Seoul, South Korea contributed to this report.

    JULY 14th 2007

    U.S. says North Korea shuts down nuclear reactor

    By James Vicini Reuters - Saturday, July 14 11:58 pm

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) - North Korea has told the United States it has shut down a nuclear reactor as part of a disarmament deal, the U.S. State Department said on Saturday after a team of U.N. nuclear inspectors arrived in Pyongyang.

    "We welcome this development and look forward to the verification and monitoring of this shutdown by the International Atomic Energy Agency team that has arrived" in North Korea, State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said.

    North Korea said last week it would consider suspending the operation of its nuclear facilities as soon as it received the first shipment of oil from South Korea under a February 13 aid-for-disarmament deal.

    A South Korean tanker carrying 6,200 tonnes of fuel oil arrived early on Saturday at the North Korea's northeastern port of Sonbong, the Unification Ministry in Seoul said.

    McCormack said U.S. negotiators looked forward to the next step of the February 13 agreement, in which North Korea "has committed to declaring all its nuclear programs and disabling all its existing nuclear facilities."

    North Korea conducted its first nuclear test in October 2006.

    The announcement about the shutdown of the Yongbyon nuclear facilities, made in a two-paragraph statement, came on the same day as the arrival in Pyongyang of a team from the U.N. nuclear watchdog agency.

    The leader of the IAEA team said earlier in Beijing they would be go straight to Yongbyon, which is north of Pyongyang, on Saturday to begin work at the complex, which produces weapons-grade plutonium.

    The team of 10 experts is the first to return to monitor the shutdown after a 4 1/2-year absence.


    IAEA Director General Mohamed ElBaradei has said it would take about a month to set up the monitoring equipment. "I am quite optimistic that this is a good step in the right direction," he said.

    In his statement, McCormack said, "We, along with all our other six-party partners, remain firmly committed to achieving the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula."

    The six-party talks are scheduled to resume in Beijing on Wednesday, he said.

    The talks, at which North Korea sits down with the United States, South Korea, China, Japan and Russia, are expected to map out the next stage of the disarmament process.

    The other five have promised massive economic aid and better diplomatic ties if North Korea scraps its nuclear arms program.

    "How smoothly the rest of the operation will go very much depends on how progress will be made in the six-party talks," ElBaradei said. "It is going to be a long process."

    U.S. nuclear negotiator Christopher Hill, who is visiting Japan, told Japanese media he expects North Korea will produce a list of all its nuclear facilities in the coming weeks or months.

    "We would expect the comprehensive list, declaration (of North Korea's nuclear programs) to be in a matter of several weeks, possibly couple of months," Hill said, according to a Kyodo report from the resort town of Hakone.

    In 2002, the United States accused North Korea of operating a covert uranium enrichment program in violation of a 1994 nuclear-freeze deal. In December 2002, the North expelled IAEA inspectors and said it would restart its reactor.

    (Additional reporting by Jack Kim in Seoul, Chris Buckley and Lucy Hornby in Beijing and Chisa Fujioka in Tokyo)

    AUGUST 8th 2007

    Korea leaders to hold second-ever summit

    By BURT HERMAN, Associated Press Writer

    The leaders of North and South Korea, capitalizing on progress in shutting down the North's nuclear program, plan to meet later this month for the second-ever summit between the longtime foes, officials said Wednesday.

    North Korean leader Kim Jong Il will host South Korean President Roh Moo-hyun from Aug. 28-30 in Pyongyang, North Korea's capital, South Korean presidential security adviser Baek Jong-chun told reporters.

    At the first North-South summit, Kim met then-South Korean President Kim Dae-jung in June 2000, also in Pyongyang.

    "The second inter-Korean summit will contribute to substantially opening the era of peace and prosperity between the two Koreas," South Korea's presidential office said in a statement.

    The two Koreas remain technically at war since the 1950-53 Korean War ended in a cease-fire, not a peace treaty, but the 2000 meeting led them to embark on economic cooperation projects and stage reunions of thousands of relatives split by their shared border — the world's most heavily fortified.

    Kim Dae-jung won a Nobel Peace Prize for his efforts to engage North Korea, but the achievement was tainted by later revelations that South Korea made secret payments to foster the meeting.

    Kim Jong Il believed the timing was right for a second meeting due to the state of relations between the two Koreas and the improved regional situation, South Korean National Intelligence Service head Kim Man-bok quoted his North Korean counterpart as saying earlier this month. The South's spy chief twice visited the North to arrange the summit.

    In Washington, State Department spokeswoman Joanne Moore hailed the announcement.

    "We have long welcomed and supported North-South dialogue and hope this meeting will help promote peace and security on the Korean Peninsula and fulfilling the goals of the six-party talks," she said in a statement.

    The summit comes amid optimism on the peninsula as North Korea has made strides in abandoning its nuclear weapons program, including shutting down its sole operating nuclear reactor last month in exchange for oil aid. The United States and other regional powers are negotiating with the North on a timeline for the communist nation to declare all its nuclear programs and disable the facilities.

    The South's Baek said the summit would help achieve progress in resolving the nuclear standoff and in relations between the Koreas, including the establishment of a peace regime on the peninsula.

    Under agreements at the international nuclear talks, the main countries involved in the Korean War — also including the United States and China — are to begin discussions on a possible resolution of the 54-year-old cease-fire.

    However, North Korea has consistently refused to engage South Korea on the nuclear standoff during regular meetings between the two sides. Pyongyang views the nuclear issue as a dispute solely with Washington — making it unlikely that a summit would achieve any further arms breakthroughs.

    Kim Jong Il promised in 2000 to make a return visit to South Korea for a second summit. But Kim Man-bok said Roh had accepted North Korea's proposal for Pyongyang as the venue.

    Roh, a former human rights lawyer who took office in 2003, has repeatedly said that he would meet with Kim at any time and any place and there has been persistent talk this year that a summit was possible. The conservative opposition Grand National Party blasted such potential plans, however, calling them an election ploy ahead of South Korea's December presidential vote.

    Roh, 61, is set to leave office in February and has seen his popularity plummet amid perceptions he has bungled handling of the economy and security policies.

    On Wednesday, the Grand National Party renewed its opposition to a summit as a political move aimed at bolstering the embattled liberals.

    "At this point, there is nothing to expect from the summit," party spokeswoman Na Kyung-won said in a statement.

    South Korean citizens questioned why Kim Jong Il had not fulfilled his promise to travel to the South and were divided on whether the meeting would help reconciliation with the North.

    "It's humiliating that the summit is going to be held in Pyongyang, the capital of North Korea, again," said Son Jin, 88, a political activist. "It's high time that North Korea had to visit to Seoul."

    Kim Bong-chon, a 62-year-old businessman, said he hoped the event was not just for political gain. "Nothing is better than having regular meetings between the leaders to reconcile the relationship," he said.

    At the first summit, Kim Jong Il warmly greeted his South Korean counterpart on the tarmac immediately upon landing, showing a human side of the reclusive North Korean leader known for his trademark jumpsuit and sunglasses. The 65-year-old leader assumed power in 1994 after the death of his father, North Korea's founding ruler Kim Il Sung, who technically remains the country's president.

    Since then, the countries have launched a joint industrial zone in North Korean border city of Kaesong, bringing together South Korean know-how and cheap North Korean labor. More than 17,000 relatives split by the border have met in brief tearful reunions, and roads and rail lines have been reconnected across the frontier.


    Associated Press writer Kwang-tae Kim contributed to this report.

    SEPTEMBER 2nd 2007
    North Korea 'to end nuclear work'
    North Korea has agreed to declare and disable all its nuclear facilities by the end of this year, the US negotiator at talks with Pyongyang in Geneva said.

    Christopher Hill said details of the deal would be discussed at six-party talks in China, later in September.

    North Korea tested a nuclear device last year, but has since agreed a deal to shut down its programme in return for economic and other aid.

    It has already shut down its main nuclear reactor at Yongbyon.

    Slow process

    Mr Hill was speaking after meeting North Korea's top nuclear negotiator, Kim Kye-gwan, for two days in Geneva.

    N Korea to "shut down and seal" Yongbyon reactor, then disable all nuclear facilities
    In return, will be given 1m tons of heavy fuel oil
    N Korea to invite IAEA back to monitor deal
    Under earlier 2005 deal, N Korea agreed to end nuclear programme and return to non-proliferation treaty
    N Korea's demand for light water reactor to be discussed at "appropriate time"

    Mr Hill said the talks were "very good and very substantive".

    "One thing that we agreed on is that the [North] will provide a full declaration of all of their nuclear programmes and will disable their nuclear programmes by the end of this year, 2007," he said.

    Mr Hill had earlier said there could be no normalisation of US-North Korea ties without a nuclear agreement.

    But he said: "To the extent that we can move quickly to de-nuclearisation, we can move quickly to normalisation."

    Mr Kim has not yet commented on the talks.

    The six-party negotiations involve the two Koreas, China, Russia, the US and Japan.

    The North agreed in principle to halt nuclear work in return for economic and diplomatic benefits two years ago but the process has been slow and fraught with difficulties.

    Problems continued even after a more concrete agreement was reached in February this year.

    A wrangle over North Korean funds frozen in a bank in Macau held up the closure of Yongbyon. The issue was finally resolved and the reactor shut.

    The North then received 50,000 tons of heavy fuel oil from South Korea.

    A further 950,000 tons is dependent on ending all nuclear programmes.

    Observers suggest Washington now seems prepared to remove North Korea from its list of countries backing terrorism, but it has yet to make its conditions clear.

    FEBRUARY 26th 2008
    I have refrained from comment since September 2nd last year, but I think the diplomats are getting the message.
    The dismantling of all the Nuclear capability of North Korea is going slowly. Let us hope this cultural contact can speed it up. Bear in mind that not losing respect is important for the dear leader. This is a good idea. It's a big move.

    There are those who still think the way to get results was by refusing to acknowledge the validity or legitimacy of the North Korean leadership on the grounds that it completely and brutally disallows dissent. This fails to understand the point of view of most North Koreans and will not get them to change that point of view.  It will take time, and so it should. I refer to my first entry in July 2006.

    One of the most eminent US cultural institutions, the New York Philharmonic Orchestra, has performed a landmark concert in North Korea.

    MARCH 5th 2008

    China in efforts to bridge U.S., N.Korea differences


    China is in discussions with the United States and North Korea on how to bridge differences and restart talks on ending the North's nuclear ambitions, a senior Chinese Foreign Ministry official said on Thursday.

    Talks on disarming North Korea have been on hold since Pyongyang missed an end-2007 deadline to give a complete inventory of its nuclear arms program as agreed under a multilateral deal.

    "China has raised all kinds of means with both the American and the North Korean sides," Vice Foreign Minister Wu Dawei told reporters on the sidelines of China's annual parliament session.

    "We are still discussing these means."

    China hosts the disarmament talks that also include the two Koreas, the United States, Japan and Russia, and, as an old Communist ally of North Korea, it is seen as wielding particular influence over its impoverished and isolated neighbor.

    U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice hinted at progress towards implementing the deal, under which the North committed to abandon all nuclear weapons and programs in exchange for aid and diplomatic benefits, following a visit to Beijing last month.

    Rice urged China to press North Korea to disclose its nuclear programs so that the stalled accord can move forward and left the chief U.S. negotiator on the issue, Christopher Hill, in Beijing an extra day to follow up on her talks.

    Hill made an unexpected return visit to Beijing last weekend, where Japanese news reports said China was trying to broker a meeting between him and the North's envoy, but North Korean negotiator Kim Kye-gwan failed to turn up.

    Wu said North Korea and the other parties disagreed over what constituted "complete and accurate," in reference to any declaration of its nuclear programs.

    U.S. officials say Pyongyang is reluctant to discuss any transfers of nuclear technology to other nations or its suspected pursuit of uranium enrichment.

    Wu said it was not time yet to give up on the deal.

    "I believe that with the efforts of all sides, the six-party talks can continue to move forward," he said.

    "You can be at ease."

    (Reporting by Lindsay Beck; Editing by Nick Macfie)

    MAY 13th 2008
    US welcomes N Korea nuclear files

    A senior US diplomat says North Korea appears to have handed over full details of its plutonium production programme to the Americans.

    The US official, Sung Kim, returned to Washington from Pyongyang on Monday with over 18,000 pages of documents.

    He said they were still being translated but appeared to be complete and described the handover as "an important first step".

    They do not cover North Korea's alleged uranium enrichment programme.

    The documents log activities at North Korea's plutonium reactor at Yongbyon, which is thought to have produced the material for nuclear tests in October 2006.

    North Korea shut down the reactor last year, but failed to meet a December 2007 deadline to give a full account of its nuclear activities.

    "These are operating and production records for the five-megawatt reactor and the reprocessing plant in Yongbyon," Mr Kim told a press conference in Washington.

    A team of experts will review the Korean-language documents which still have to be translated, he said.

    North Korea reached an agreement last year with the US, China, Japan, Russia and South Korea to end its nuclear programme in return for large-scale aid and the lifting of US sanctions.

    But the deal stalled because of a dispute over whether it had fully declared all its nuclear activities.

    Mr Kim said it was not yet clear if that declaration would be "ready anytime soon" to be handed to China, the host of the six-party talks.

    JUNE 26th 2008
    North Korea is officially removed from the Axis of Evil list. There is much further to go of course but this is progress regardless of Bolton's moaning. Nobody is running rings round anyone, dear old walrus.

    US to ease North Korea sanctions

    Please turn on JavaScript. Media requires JavaScript to play.

    George W Bush cautiously welcomes the belated declaration

    The US has agreed to scrap some of its sanctions on North Korea, after the isolated state handed over long-awaited details of its nuclear programme.

    US President George W Bush promised to rescind the Trading with the Enemy Act - although many other sanctions against Pyongyang will remain in place.

    The North now intends to blow up a cooling tower from its main reactor.

    Pyongyang agreed to scrap its nuclear ambitions 16 months ago in return for aid and diplomatic concessions.

    But six-nation talks on the North's nuclear plans stalled at the end of last year when Pyongyang missed a deadline to provide its account of the programme.

    The document handed over to China on Thursday is six months overdue and is not certain to satisfy the international community.

    It is expected to cover the North's plutonium production activities, but analysts believe it will not address other key issues including a suspected uranium enrichment programme.

    Plutonium and enriched uranium can both be used to manufacture weapons - but the North has always denied having a weapons programme.

    2002: N Korea pulls out of previous deal after US accuses it of having secret uranium programme
    October 2006: North Korea carries out its first test of a nuclear weapon
    February 2007: N Korea agrees to end nuclear activities in return for aid
    July 2007: North Korea closes its Yongbyon nuclear reactor and allows IAEA inspectors in
    December 2007: N Korea misses a deadline to hand over a declaration of its nuclear work
    June 2008: N Korea hands over nuclear programme details; US cautiously welcomes the move

    Pyongyang's move appears to have breathed new life into the six-party talks - which include Russia, North and South Korea, the US, Japan and China.

    Russia has suggested restarting the meetings as early as next week.

    And President Bush not only pledged to lift some sanctions on the North, but also said he would remove the Stalinist regime from its list of state sponsors of terrorism.

    Removal from the terror list would pave the way towards lifting many of the most stringent sanctions.

    However, Mr Bush was clear that moves to take the country from the terror list would not begin for 45 days, and would start only if the North's claims were verified.

    "We remain deeply concerned about North Korea's human rights abuses, uranium enrichment activities, nuclear testing and proliferation, ballistic missile programmes and the threat it continues to pose to South Korea and its neighbours," he said.

    "It will remain one of the most heavily-sanctioned nations in the world."

    Lifting the Trading with the Enemy Act has no effect on key restrictions on weapons proliferation, illicit financing activities and money laundering.

    And officials said Washington could re-impose sanctions if Pyongyang's declaration failed to live up to expectations.

    BBC diplomatic correspondent Jonathan Marcus says the ultimate issue now is what will be done about the small stockpile of highly-enriched nuclear material diplomats believe the North has stashed away.

    And the possibility that the country has managed to build a small number of weapons has not even been touched on yet, our correspondent says.

    Another potential stumbling block is the allegation that the North helped Syria to build a nuclear facility - a claim denied by Pyongyang.

    The next move for North Korea is the destruction of the cooling tower at the Yongbyon reactor. The plant was disabled last year, and the tower's destruction will be televised.

    SEPTEMBER 14th 2008
    Two points to ponder from the following Reuters report:
    Was the hiatus in diplomatic progress due to Kim's illness or to internal opposition taking advantage of it?
    When he passes on, will there be a dangerous loss of control? or a hardline regime?

    North Korea's Kim fell seriously ill in April: report

    Sun Sep 14, 5:15 AM ET   Reuters

    North Korean leader Kim Jong-il fell seriously ill in April, sometimes losing consciousness at work and unable to rule on important policy matters, the Mainichi daily reported on Sunday, citing a "reliable" Chinese source.

    The Japanese newspaper said Kim's poor health was apparently behind the lack of flexibility in North Korea's recent attitude towards the six-party dialogue over its nuclear program.

    Kim, 66, had been making all decisions on the country's nuclear policy, the source told Mainichi, and after his health worsened there was no one who could make major diplomatic moves.

    This raised speculation that hard-line military figures had increased their clout in the leadership ranks.

    North Korea's official media had reported no public appearance by the reclusive "Dear Leader" since mid-August, but Kim's failure to attend last Tuesday's triumphal military parade marking the state's 60th anniversary made worldwide headlines.

    Speculation swirled that he had suffered a stroke, was gravely ill or even that he had been dead for years and replaced by look-alikes for state occasions.

    The following day, North Korea's nominal number two leader, Kim Yong-nam, told Japan's Kyodo news agency: "(There is) no problem."

    Senior North Korean diplomat Song Il-ho told Kyodo: "We see such reports as not only worthless, but rather as a conspiracy plot."

    The communist state's official media have continued their blanket praise this week for Kim and his late father, state founder Kim Il-sung, with not the slightest acknowledgment that there might be a power vacuum at the summit of the state.

    The Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) carried an item on Sunday saying that Kim had sent birthday greetings to Russian President Dmitry Medvedev.

    Sunday's Mainichi report said Kim had first complained of problems with multiple organs, including his heart and kidneys, in the summer of 2007 and his condition had gradually worsened.

    Citing the same Chinese source, the daily said Kim, who often used to work late into the night and early in the morning, had become unable to do so as his health progressively failed and his judgment deteriorated.

    (Reporting by Taiga Uranaka, editing by Roger Crabb)

    SEPTEMBER 19th 2008
    The fundamental reason for these actions (or lack of actions) by N Korea is that, for them, it is the only game in town. Their society is basically dysfunctional in modern terms, they perceive the US as preoccupied and weakened by financial confusion, and so they play a card that keeps the game in play with, they believe, no risk to them. But behind the scenes, it could indicate a leadership play amongst those bidding to take over when Kim dies, led by one who believes that holding the nuclear card, of which he is a technocratically able player (unlike Kim), will be his passport to the leadership and the way to guarantee protection from 'regime change' instigated from outside. Mr Bolton will no doubt say he saw this all along, and that the N.K. regime are'running rings' around the US. I disagree. The N. Korean regime is a paranoid group of the classic kind. Some in the regime have looked at recent happenings in the US and consider it to be time to get back with a few insults. They see what they think is the collapse of capitalism (instead of a classic screw-up the libeal democracies suffer fropm quite regularly), and they no doubt find the worship of Sarah Palin quite laughable, which it would be if it were not so disturbing. Result, they have decided to thumb their nose and say they don't care if they are on or off the Axis of Evil list. They are making a big mistake, but then they are not alone in this proclivity.

    North Korea preparing to restart nuclear facility

    By HYUNG-JIN KIM, Associated Press Writer

    North Korea said Friday it was preparing to restart its nuclear reactor, accusing the United States of failing to fulfill its obligations under an international disarmament-for-aid agreement.

    It was the first time the North has confirmed it has begun reversing what it has done so far to roll back its nuclear program, though it has warned it would do so in anger over Washington's failure to remove it from the U.S. terrorism blacklist.

    "We are making thorough preparations for restoration" of the Yongbyon nuclear complex, the deputy director-general of North Korea's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Hyun Hak Bong, told reporters. He did not say when Yongbyon might begin operating again.

    Hyun spoke to reporters in the border village of Panmunjom before sitting down for talks Friday with South Korean officials on sending energy aid to the North as part of the six-nation disarmament deal.

    Under the landmark 2007 pact — involving the two Koreas, the U.S., China, Russia and Japan — North Korea pledged to disable its nuclear program in a step toward its eventual dismantlement in exchange for diplomatic concessions and energy aid equivalent to 1 million tons of oil.

    North Korea began disabling the Yongbyon complex last year, and the process was 90 percent complete, with eight of 11 key steps carried out "perfectly and flawlessly," Hyun said.

    Major progress was made in the agreement in late June when North Korea submitted a long-delayed declaration of its nuclear activities and destroyed the cooling tower at Yongbyon in a show of its commitment to denuclearization.

    But the accord ran aground in mid-August when Washington refused to take North Korea off its list of states that sponsor terrorism until the North accepts a plan to verify its nuclear declaration.

    North Korea responded by halting the disabling process and is now "proceeding with work to restore (Yongbyon) to its original status," Hyun told reporters.

    South Korean and U.S. officials have said it would take at least a year for North Korea to restart the reactor if it is completely disabled.

    Hyun warned Washington not to press the verification issue, saying verification was never part of the deal.

    "The U.S. is insisting that we accept unilateral demands that had not been agreed upon," he said. Hyun said forcing North Korea to comply with such an inspection would exacerbate tensions.

    The White House had no immediate reaction early Friday.

    The six-nation talks last convened in July, and a new round has not been scheduled because of the current standoff between the U.S. and North Korea.

    However, the talks Friday between the two Koreas — which were proposed by the North — indicate it does not want to completely scuttle the six-party negotiations, analysts said.

    "The North is sending a message that it wants to maintain the six-party talks," said Koh Yu-hwan, a North Korea expert at Seoul's Dongguk University. "The North also wants to get the remaining energy aid with winter drawing closer."

    Seoul's delegate, Hwang Joon-kook, assured North Korea that it would receive the remaining energy aid it was promised.

    South Korea's foreign minister said North Korea's intentions remained unclear.

    "It's still uncertain whether the North's measures are aimed at reversing the whole situation to the pre-disablement level" or are a negotiating tactic, Yu Myung-hwan told reporters.

    The tensions come amid reports that North Korean leader Kim Jong Il has suffered a stroke. Kim, 66, has not been seen in public for more than a month and has missed two major public events: a military parade marking North Korea's 60th birthday and the Korean Thanksgiving holiday.


    Associated Press writer Jae-soon Chang in Seoul contributed to this report.

    OCTOBER 10th 2008
    International Herald Tribune
    U.S. closer to nuclear deal with North Korea
    Friday, October 10, 2008

    WASHINGTON: U.S. officials said they believed they were close to a deal to end a stalemate with North Korea over its nuclear program, even as Pyongyang stepped up pressure on the Bush administration by barring international inspectors from all parts of a key nuclear complex.

    The United States and North Korea have been fighting over a thorny verification issue that has held up a pact, meant to end the North's nuclear program.

    The decision by North Korea on Thursday to bar the international inspectors was the latest move by the country aimed at getting United States negotiators to ease off demands for strict measures to verify whether the North is adhering to that agreement.

    Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said Thursday that she was still hoping to preserve the accord and to put in place the verification measures the United States was seeking. Other Bush administration officials said they believed that they were close to a deal on verification, a step that the United States would then reward by removing North Korea from the list of state sponsors of terrorism.

    "If we can get a verification protocol that we are satisfied with, then we would be able to fulfill our side of the bargain," the White House spokeswoman, Dana Perino, said Thursday.

    The nuclear agreement was reached earlier this year, and the administration has hoped that it will be one of President George W. Bush's signature accomplishments. But the deal has been called into question as the two countries have fought over verification measures.

    Christopher Hill, the administration's top North Korea envoy, has been meeting with Rice and other top officials since his return from the North a few days ago with what administration officials say is the outline of a possible way out of the verification morass.

    Hill and Rice have kept a tight lid on the talks, but one administration official with knowledge of the negotiations said that they remained centered on how much freedom North Korea was willing to give international weapons inspectors to examine and take samples from its suspected nuclear sites.

    In particular, the North is skittish about allowing inspectors to examine as-yet-undeclared sites, for fear that it would establish a precedent for inspectors to go wherever they want in the country.

    The official who provided details of the talks spoke on the condition of anonymity under normal diplomatic rules.

    North Korea's negotiators have strenuously complained that the Bush administration has not removed the country from a list of state sponsors of terrorism, as Bush announced in June that he was prepared to do, and that it has instead made new demands. Those include requiring North Korea to accept the verification system before the United States carried out reciprocal steps, a condition not put in writing.

    OCTOBER 11th 2008

    Diplomats: North Korea coming off terror blacklist

    By MATTHEW LEE, Associated Press Writer

    The United States is ready to drop North Korea from a terrorism blacklist, the Associated Press has learned, in the latest attempt by the administration to salvage a nuclear deal with Pyongyang before President Bush's term ends.

    The act of striking North Korea from the list of countries said to be perpetrating terrorists acts could come as early as Saturday, now that Bush has approved it, say diplomats briefed on the initiatives pressing the North to abandon its atomic weapons program.

    The removal would be only provisional, officials said, and North Korea would be put back on the State Department's "state sponsors of terrorism" list if it doesn't comply with inspections of its nuclear facilities. The diplomats spoke on condition of anonymity because the administration has not yet announced the step.

    The expected delisting comes as North Korea moves to restart a disabled nuclear reactor and takes other provocative actions, including expelling U.N. inspectors and test firing missiles. These steps in recent weeks have heightened tensions between Washington and Pyongyang and threatened a shaky disarmament agreement.

    It also follows days of intense internal debate in Washington and consultations with U.S. negotiating partners China, South Korea, Russia and Japan. Tokyo had balked at the move because the North has not yet resolved issues related to its abduction of Japanese citizens.

    Neither the White House nor the State Department would comment on the decision, which has been in the works since chief U.S. negotiator Christopher Hill returned from a trip to North Korea late last week.

    But earlier Friday, U.S. officials said they were trying to build a consensus among negotiating partners on the step as well as the inspection regime that Washington insists must accompany the delisting.

    "We're continuing to work with our six-party partners," White House press secretary Dana Perino said, referring to China, Japan, Russia and South Korea, which along with the United States and North Korea make up the group of countries working on the deal.

    Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice spoke on Friday with the foreign ministers of China, South Korea and Japan and was trying to reach her Russian counterpart, State Department spokesman Sean McCormack told reporters.

    "The point where we're at now is making sure everybody agrees," he said.

    At issue was whether tentative arrangements worked out last week between Hill and the North Koreans were acceptable to the others. Under those terms, the U.S. would provisionally remove North Korea from the terror list once the North agrees to the inspections.

    McCormack dismissed suggestions the United States was trying to force an agreement on its partners and declined to say which, if any, countries were preventing a consensus.

    However, Japan had been resistant, arguing that North Korea should not be taken off the list until the cases of Japanese citizens abducted by Pyongyang in the 1970s and '80s are resolved.

    North Korea was among a group of nations — Bush called them the "axis of evil" — that the United States singled out for condemnation early in the president's first term. His current term ends next Jan. 20, when a successor will be inaugurated.

    OCTOBER 18th 2008

    U.S. says North Korea stuck to nuclear promises

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) – North Korea has kept its promise and reversed steps to restart its nuclear reactor at Yongbyon after an agreement last weekend between Washington and Pyongyang, the State Department said on Friday.

    "The North Koreans have in their efforts reversed all their reversals in the reactor. All the seals are back on, the surveillance equipment is back, reinstalled. And the equipment that had been removed is back where it had been," said State Department spokesman Sean McCormack.

    "In addition, they have moved more rods from the reactor. On the reactor, they have actually gone beyond where they were prior to their reversing the disablement steps," he told reporters, adding that 60 percent of the nuclear fuel rods had been taken out of the reactor.

    However, in the fuel reprocessing facility, the North Koreans had more to do. "They have not yet gotten to that baseline where they were," he said. "There is still work to be done, but progress on it."

    Last weekend's deal was a desperate attempt by the United States to save disablement talks that were collapsing as North Korea began to reverse earlier steps it had taken to disable its Soviet-era plant at Yongbyon.

    Asked whether the United States was satisfied the North was keeping its promises on disablement, McCormack said: "Thus far, yes."


    The United States took North Korea off its terrorism blacklist last weekend after the two countries agreed on a series of measures to verify Pyongyang's nuclear program, including taking samples out of the country.

    Inspectors will now be allowed access to all declared nuclear sites and "based on mutual consent" to sites not declared by the North.

    Those steps still have to be formally agreed on by the two Koreas, the United States, Russia, Japan and China -- the six nations handling North Korea's nuclear dossier.

    McCormack said China was expected soon to announce a meeting of the six nations to affirm in writing the verification steps agreed on by the United States and the North.

    On a visit to Washington, South Korean Defense Minister Lee Sang-hee and U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates, welcomed the resumption of disabling work at Yongbyon and "urged North Korea to fully cooperate on the verification regime."

    "North Korea's continued development of its weapons of mass destruction program, along with its ballistic missiles and the threat of proliferation, pose a serious challenge to the U.S.-ROK Alliance and the peace and security of northeast Asia," the ministers said in a joint statement.

    North Korea tested a nuclear device in 2006 using plutonium and is suspected of pursuing a uranium enrichment program that would provide a second path to make fissile material for nuclear weapons.

    The latest measures agreed on include both the plutonium-based program and any uranium enrichment and proliferation activities.

    (Additional reporting by Paul Eckert; Editing by Chris Wilson)

    APRIL 5th 2009
    In spite of very strong advice to the contrary, North Korea has just launched what they claim is a satellite but in fact was a test of an intercontinental ballistic missile. Obama has denounced this as a deliberate breaking of the UN resolutions against the proliferation of nuclear weapons. His denouncement was uncharacteristically strident, a method of speech I trust he is not about to adopt, reminiscent as it is of Doubya Bush. We all know how America acting alone and threatening is the one way to wind up paranoid dictators and their followers and not the way to get them to cause as little trouble as possible until in time their need to feed their unfortunate people brings them to conclusion that an arms race is not the way.

    North Korea requires handling, it requires a unified world approach, not a shouting American president. As long as Obama continues to rally the international community he can get the job done and even move further to reduce all nuclear weapons. The technology cannot be disinvented, there are many nuclear scientists and missile scientists. Nuclear deterrence still works against states, even rogue states. The danger is failed states and terrorists. Cool heads are needed. A world-wide ban on nuclear testing is a worthy and achievable goal.

    APRIL 14 2009
    More wind and piss. They will come back to the talks of course unless they have somewhere else to go. If the international players keep their act together they will not find anywhere.

    SEOUL (Reuters) - North Korea said on Tuesday it would quit international nuclear disarmament talks and restart a plant that makes bomb-grade plutonium after the United Nations chastised it for launching a long-range rocket.

    MAY 15th 2009
    Now we have got the actual test over with (it was inevitable, these paranoid regimes annot afford to lose face) perhap we can get N.K. back to the talks. The danger with all small nuclear powers is not that they will launch a nuclear strike but that the technology they insist on getting to grips with, and the materials they insist it is their right to have, are not secure. They can be bought or stolen or even given away to cause a nuisance or serious harm. No doubt N.K. will milk this one financially to the highest bidder, the International Community will aim to be that bidder, but then we have to know if we really have full access and exclusive rights to their nuclear program. We are dealing here with a leader on his last lap and no doubt a group of underlings who are both paranoid and jockying for position. They believe the US will try to use the moment of changeover to remove the lot of them because they themselves know what sort of regime they are running.

    Outrage over N Korea nuclear test

    There have been expressions of international outrage after North Korea said it had successfully carried out an underground nuclear test.

    After seismologists confirmed it had the power of a 4.5 quake, the US president said North Korea's programme posed a "grave threat" to world peace.

    China and Russia also condemned the test and called for a return to talks.

    The UN Security Council is to meet later in New York for emergency talks on how it should respond.

    It is being reported that North Korea gave warning of an imminent test to the US less than an hour before it happened.

    It appears to have been a much more powerful blast than North Korea's first nuclear test, in October 2006.

    BBC world affairs correspondent David Loyn says North Korea appears to have moved from a posture of negotiation to confrontation over the nuclear issue.

    'Stronger than 2006'

    An official communique read out on North Korean state radio said another round of underground nuclear testing had been "successfully conducted... as part of measures to enhance the Republic's self-defensive nuclear deterrent in all directions".

    The North did not report the test site but South Korean officials placed it in the north-eastern region around the town of Kilju, the site of North Korea's first nuclear test.

    Quentin Sommerville, BBC News, Beijing Even North Korea's closest ally is losing patience with Pyongyang. China's foreign ministry says that North Korea has ignored international opposition and that the Chinese government resolutely opposes today's nuclear tests.

    Those are strong words but they're also very familiar. Back in 2006, China condemned an earlier nuclear detonation as a brazen act. Then, as now, it urged North Korea back to the negotiating table.

    But Pyongyang doesn't appear to be listening. Even though it depends on China's protection and support, North Korea is nobody's puppet.

    Even with this latest nuclear test, another snub to China's leadership, there's little appetite in Beijing for tightening the screws on its neighbour. Doing so might spark a humanitarian or political crisis which could send hundreds of thousands or millions of refugees pouring over China's 800-mile long shared border. As powerful as China is, even it can't risk forcing Pyongyang's hand.

    Monitors from the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty Organisation had been unable to determine if the event had a "nuclear background", its executive secretary, Tibor Toth, told reporters.

    However, they did detect a "very close-to-surface type of event" measuring 4.5 on the Richter scale, Mr Toth said. That would make it stronger than the October 2006 test, which had a magnitude of around 4.1.

    Russia's defence ministry estimated a blast of up to 20 kilotons - comparable to the American bombs that flattened Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945.

    A US official in Washington, who spoke to Reuters news agency on condition of anonymity, said Pyongyang had given less than an hour's notice of the test, and had made no demands.

    The message was conveyed through the "New York channel", the official added, referring to contacts between North Korean diplomats and US officials at the UN.

    There are unconfirmed reports that North Korea also test-fired two short-range missiles.


    Speaking outside the White House, US President Barack Obama said the US would work with its allies around the world to "stand up to" North Korea.

  • Oct 2006 - North Korea conducts an underground nuclear test
  • Feb 2007 - North Korea agrees to close its main nuclear reactor in exchange for fuel aid
  • June 2007 - North Korea shuts its main Yongbyon reactor
  • June 2008 - North Korea makes its long-awaited declaration of nuclear assets
  • Oct 2008 - The US removes North Korea from its list of countries which sponsor terrorism
  • Dec 2008 - Pyongyang slows work to dismantle its nuclear programme after a US decision to suspend energy aid
  • Jan 2009 - The North says it is scrapping all military and political deals with the South, accusing it of "hostile intent"
  • April 2009 - Pyongyang launches a rocket carrying what it says is a communications satellite
  • 25 May 2009 - North Korea conducts a second nuclear test
  • "North Korea has previously committed to abandoning its nuclear programme," he said.

    "Instead of following through on that commitment, it has chosen to ignore that commitment. Its actions have also flown in the face of United Nations resolutions. As a result North Korea is not only deepening its own isolation it's also inviting stronger international pressure."

    South Korea said the test was an intolerable "provocation" while Japan said any nuclear test by the North was "unacceptable", and both said they would ask for action from the Security Council.

    UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon said he was "deeply disturbed". UN Security Council Resolution 1718 demands that North Korea refrain from nuclear testing.

    UK Prime Minister Gordon Brown said the test would "undermine prospects for peace on the Korean peninsula".

    Russia and China echoed the words of condemnation with Beijing saying it was "resolutely opposed" to the test and Moscow describing it as a "blow to non-proliferation efforts".

    Both urged North Korea back to the negotiating table.

    The six-party disarmament talks - involving the US, China, Japan, Russia and the two Koreas - stalled last year over Pyongyang's failure to agree how information it has handed over on its nuclear activities and facilities should be verified.

    AUGUST 4th 2009
    I have ignored the provocative acts of North Korea over the past few months as it was clear that the Obama administration was concerned elswhere and North Korea was a bit miffed at not being the subject of serious attention. Now Bill Clinton has been on a goodwill personal visit to get two jailed American journalists released. I expected nothing less. Though all that had to be done to improve relations was to get the diplomatically illiterate Republicans out of the White House, we may now expect thanks to Clinton a relaxation and a move toward N. Korea rejoining the International Community. The visit was of course done with the full approval of the Whitehouse.

    North Korean leader Kim Jong-il has issued a special pardon to two detained US journalists, the country's state news agency reports.

    Laura Ling and Euna Lee had been found guilty of entering illegally in March.

    The news comes hours after former US President Bill Clinton made an unannounced visit to Pyongyang on what was described as a private mission.

    Mr Clinton is the highest-profile American to visit since ex-secretary of state Madeleine Albright in 2000.

    OCTOBER 14th 2009
    At the opening of this file over 3 years ago I advised working with China on the problem of rogue states developing nuclear capability when these come within the Chinese sphere of influence. China can after all provide security to insecure regimes that might develop nuclear warheads and rockets to carry them out of paranoia . The threat from such regimes is less that they would launch them to attack another nation (a suicidal action) than the damage that could be done to many nations by exploding a nuclear warhead at altitude to create an electromagnetic pulse, against which almost all countries have failed to protect their electrical infrastructure.

    U.S. hails cooperation on North Korea, sees new steps

    BEIJING (Reuters) – North Korea's neighbors and the United States are coordinating closely to draw the isolated state back to nuclear disarmament talks and reviewing possible next steps, a senior U.S. diplomat said on Wednesday.

    Many analysts have been skeptical of North Korean leader Kim Jong-il's recent avowal that he could return to six-party talks aimed at dismantling his country's nuclear weapons program.

    But other governments in the stalled negotiations are working closely together on ways to bring Pyongyang back to them, Kurt Campbell, U.S. Assistant Secretary of State, told reporters.

    Kim made the heavily hedged commitment during a meeting with Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao this month and Campbell said there were no divisions between Washington and Beijing over how to deal with Pyongyang.

    "I have rarely seen better coordination between China and the United States in particular," said Campbell, formerly a scholar specialized in Asian security.

    "There is a virtually unprecedented acceptance of basic goals and ambitions associated with the six-party talks and negotiations with North Korea."

    Those talks bring together North and South Korea, China, the United States, Japan and Russia.

    Campbell, the Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific affairs, has been in Beijing for two days of talks ahead of President Barack Obama's visit next month.

    The range of issues discussed underscored the growing importance of China to U.S. policy. Campbell said they also covered Myanmar, Iran, military ties and climate change.

    North Korea has said it wants bilateral negotiations with the United States to take precedence over the six-party talks, which China has hosted since 2003.

    The North walked away from the talks last December and in April declared them defunct. In May, it staged its second ever nuclear test blast, drawing fresh international sanctions.


    On Wednesday, North Korea's main newspaper Rodong Sinmun scorned U.S. policy as "shameless, preposterous and brigandish sophism," the official KCNA news agency reported.

    "It was none other than the U.S. that compelled the DPRK to have access to nuclear deterrent," KCNA quoted the paper as saying. The DPRK is the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, the North's formal name.

    Campbell said North Korea's neighbors agreed the six-way talks remained key to resolving the dispute and bilateral talks could only take place in the framework of the multilateral talks.

    He also said the North's neighbors may be considering fresh initiatives, but gave no details.

    "We are now reviewing steps in the near future," he said, adding that the United States was also closely consulting with Japan and South Korea.

    "I think we will have more to say about this shortly."

    Washington is also exploring wider cooperation with Beijing on other regional trouble spots, including Myanmar and Afghanistan, Campbell said.

    China is the country closest to Myanmar's military leaders and could play an important role in U.S. policy toward the isolated Southeast Asian regime, which has been under review, he said.

    "We think their insights and their role and their support behind the scenes could be very valuable going forward," he said of China's potential role in Myanmar.

    But Campbell suggested that some distance remained between Beijing and Washington on how to address Iran's nuclear program.

    Iran is a major supplier of China's imported crude oil, and Beijing has been wary of stiffer sanctions Western powers say may be needed to deter Tehran from pushing ahead with disputed nuclear activities.

    Critics say those activities could give Iran the ability to make atomic weapons. Iran says its activities are peaceful.

    "We are going to need to see more cooperation and coordination between the United States and China," Campbell said of Iran.

    (Editing by Lucy Hornby and Ron Popeski)

    MAY 20th 2010
    Anyone who has studied the history of problem children and the tricks they can play to get attention will see some resonance here in the behaviour of North Korea's ruling bunch. However, torpedoing ships and causing the needless death of 46 sailors and then denying it would indicate that there is serious incoherence at the top of the N Korean regime. Retaliation by the international community is almost pointless if we consider that the sanctions are already hurting and some part of the regime is actually lashing out in pain. They cannot comply with the terms on offer without signing their own political surrender, and if they do surrender, will the aforementioned community, beset with financial problems of its own, step in to pick up the pieces? Or just try to put them on trial?

    The rulers of North Korea do not believe democracy and a free market economy are the formula to bring salvation. A few years ago, it would be easy to say that given the state of their country, democracy and a free market economy could not possibly be worse. Now, any move that would lift sanctions, with or without democracy, would be an improvement; but the regime is backed into a corner in what looks like its last stand. It is lashing out. We are maybe approaching that moment when we need the equivalent of the legendary calm, cool copper who come forward with an outstretched hand: "Come on, don't be a fool, just give me the gun". But this image comes from another culture, and we need a version that fits the time and the place.

    MAY 30th 2010
    The Chinese leadership are taking the role of the cool copper (see above) and are takng their time. Rushing this is certainly to be avoided. The blog of the Yahoo News Editor and the comments are worth reading (well, most of them) at:

    The suggestion that South Korea sank its own ship to bring tings to a head is not sensible. That a rogue S.Korean was responsible is much less likely than a rogue N.Korean or a group within the N. Korean Military. The point is the hurt is being felt in the North, so that is where to look for the outburst, official or unofficial. Ockham's Razor should be the first method here when looking for an explanation.

    JULY 24th 2010
    North Korea threatened on Saturday to respond with nuclear weapons to a major US-South Korean naval exercise starting this weekend, saying it was ready for a "retaliatory sacred war".

    Given the possibl interpretations of the torpedoing incident in May, it looks likely we are dealing with some seriously deranged elements here who are facing their last throw. They find that in a post-credit-crunch world their economic survival fiddles are failing and their politics must come to an end as a result. The US is keeping calm and 'refuses to enagage ina war of words'. The planned exercise will of course go ahead.

    OCTOBER 5th 2010
    Since the last entry, hufffing and puffing has proceeded as usual but it is clear the Dear Leader is dying and there is a succession game going on.
    This Reuters News Report is worth a read. As pointed out over the years in this file, it is not a conventional nuclear attack from N. Korea that we need fear, that would be suicidal for them and as a nation. The regime is not yet in united suicide mode and we must assume that they have control of their scientists. However, the production of miniature devices and their supply and use is another matter. The regime still hides behind a claim of non-responsibility for the sinking of the S. Korean ship. It would find it more difficult to deny responsibility for a nuclear explosion occuring anywhere in the region.

    North Korea nuclear threat is "alarming," says South

    Mercurial North Korea's nuclear threat has reached an "alarming level" and it is now trying to miniaturise weapons to improve their mobility and impact, a South Korean government official said.

    A U.S. think-tank has also said satellite images taken last week showed that construction or excavation activity was taking place at the North's main Yongbyon nuclear complex.

    News that the North was pushing ahead with its nuclear plans in defiance of international pressure comes as Pyongyang, which has just recently set in motion a father-to-son power transition, has said it wants to return to stalled nuclear talks.

    "We have judged that North Korea is currently operating all its nuclear programmes, including highly enriched uranium processing and the nuclear facility in Yongbyon," said Kim Tae-hyo, the president's secretary for national strategy, according to the JoongAng Daily on Wednesday.

    Even though it has exploded nuclear devices, North Korea has not shown it has a working nuclear bomb. Experts say they do not believe it has the ability to miniaturise an atomic weapon to place on a missile.

    Under an earlier aid-for-disarmament agreement, the reclusive North began to close down Yongbyon, which when fully operational can produce enough fissile material for one nuclear bomb a year.

    Last year, Pyongyang announced that in the face of U.S. hostility it would restore parts of the plant, a year after blowing up the complex's cooling tower in what it said was a display of its commitment to nuclear disarmament.

    "Their nuclear programme is evolving even now at a very fast pace," Kim told a forum on the future of Northeast Asia, adding the North's nuclear threat had reached an "alarming level."

    North Korean Vice Foreign Minister Pak Kil-yon told the U.N. General Assembly last week that Pyongyang would bolster its "nuclear deterrent" in response to the threat posed by the United States, but promised never to use its atomic arsenal to attack or threaten any nation.


    The Institute for Science and International Security in Washington said in a report that satellite images showed there was activity in the area surrounding the destroyed cooling tower.

    "However, there is no indication in the imagery that North Korea is rebuilding its cooling tower," it said.

    "In addition, the new excavation activity appears to be more extensive than would be expected for rebuilding the cooling tower. But the actual purpose of this excavation activity cannot be determined from the image and bears watching."

    Until recently, there was no indication of new construction or excavation activity in the area of the destroyed cooling tower, the report said.

    The Yongbyon complex consists of a five-megawatt reactor, whose construction began in 1980, a fuel fabrication facility and a plutonium reprocessing plant, where weapons-grade material is extracted from spent fuel rods.

    The site, about 60 miles (100 km) north of Pyongyang, also houses a 50-megawatt reactor whose construction was suspended under a 1994 nuclear deal with the United States. That reactor is nowhere near completion.

    U.S. officials said prior to the North's second nuclear test last year, it had produced about 110 lbs (l50 kg) of plutonium, which proliferation experts say would be enough for six to eight nuclear weapons.

    "It is our belief that North Korea is constantly working on making their weapons smaller, as all nations with nuclear programs wish to do, in order to produce nuclear weapons with more firepower and less plutonium," Kim said.

    "When the weapons are made mobile, they will be placed in the field, and when that time comes, they could wreak immense havoc on South Korean soil wherever they are aimed."

    (Editing by Miral Fahmy)

    NOVEMBER 23rd 2010
    North Korea attack on island causes international alarm

    North Korea's shelling of an island in South Korea near a disputed sea border has drawn international condemnation.

    US President Barack Obama said he was "outraged" by the attack on Yeonpyeong island. It was also denounced by Russia, Japan and European countries.

    UN chief Ban Ki-moon called it "one of the gravest incidents since the Korean War" and urged restraint on both sides.

    South Korea returned fire and threatened missile strikes if there were "further provocations".
    I think we would be well advised to leave it to the Chinese to do the talkimg with N.Korea while the rest of us make it clear to South Korea, where there is a very mature regime, that they are not held to blame for this incident and can count on support from the international commuity. N Korea is almost in what one might call death throes, and it seems the military are attempting to prove their importance

    DECEMBER 19th 2010
    There is much international concern and tension surrounding the exercises planned for the next few days, delayed for the moment by weather. Personally as long as every country is showing concern, I think there is less to worry about than if they were not.. The less rhetoric and declarations the better.

    DECEMBER 19th 2011
    A year has passed and lo, ding, dong the Kim is dead and another Kim is in theory automatically in place. Just to make sure that those outside did not get the idea that nobody was in charge of national defence, they fired off a short range test missile before releasing the news of the leader's demise. For most of the world that had the opposite effect, meaning that indeed nobody was in charge apart from the military. However, we should keep relaxed on all this. N. Korea is a primitive society ruled by a fairly frightened group of the relatively privileged. Slowly does it. The Chinese will handle it.